Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Chapaev

From what i noticed about this film was that it foucsed entirely on the legendary commander. The reason he succeeded with the Russian public was becasue he was just an ordinary man who become this great leader once the war broke out. The movie makes him very loud and boistrous and at times very comedic and this is what made the people fall in love with him because he was an actual character not just someone who walked around on a screen with saying any words. Words definately play a big role in the success of this movie without them the audience would have lost all of the emotion that he put on the screen through his mouth and that is why Battleship Potemkin didn't have a big success with the people because the audience doesn't really get to know any of the characters in that film. I think that the combination of Chapaev and Furmanov was huge for the movie and for the Red army. While Chapaev was a great leader, Furmanov gave his intellectual side to help guide Chapaev and to make sure he did what the Red army wanted because Chapaev wasn't the smartest guy in fact he said he had only learned to read during the revolution. One symbol that i noticed from the movie was that the White general im not sure of his name but he was seen several times in the film wearing glasses and glasses were a major sign of the Old regime and everything that The Soviets hated about the czarist people. Another symbol was when they were about to fight the Whites marched up in unison together with blank expressions on their faces as if they didn't even care. They were also all dressed in sharp black outfits that made them just look like the bad guys. All together i can see why this was a great propaganda for Russia at the time.

4 comments:

  1. I would say that Chapaev recently learning to read is meant more to make him look like the "common man" or "one of the people" instead of making him look dumb. That way he is more relatable to the masses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you and Emily both. Chapaev might have been just the common man, yet he was super intellectual when it came to the war, and its tactics. I loved watching people react to his extremely good ideas when it came to attacking the enemy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with both Emily and Izzy. Socialis Realism strives on everybody being ordinary yet playing big roles to help the Soviet Union succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chapaev was very likely a character the Russians could identify with in spite of--or perhaps indeed *because of*--his foibles and flaws. Furmanov on his own might have seemed a bit too much like a "goody-two-shoes"--but the combination of him and Chapaev (plus Petka and Anka) gave the movie both something ideological and also something human.

    ReplyDelete